<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Carbon Balance and Management - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Carbon Balance and Management</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/5/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/5/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/6/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/1/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/7/1/2" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/7">
        <title>Seasonal variation of carbon fluxes in a sparse savanna
in semi arid Sudan</title>
        <description>Background:
Large spatial, seasonal and annual variability of major drivers of the carbon cycle (precipitation, temperature, fire regime and nutrient availability) are common in the Sahel region. This causes large variability in net ecosystem exchange and in vegetation productivity, the subsistence basis for a major part of the rural population in Sahel. This study compares the 2005 dry and wet season fluxes of CO2 for a grass land/sparse savanna site in semi arid Sudan and relates these fluxes to water availability and incoming photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). Data from this site could complement the current sparse observation network in Africa, a continent where climatic change could significantly impact the future and which constitute a weak link in our understanding of the global carbon cycle.
Results:
The dry season (represented by Julian day 35&#8211;46, February 2005) was characterized by low soil moisture availability, low evapotranspiration and a high vapor pressure deficit. The mean daily NEE (net ecosystem exchange, Eq. 1) was -14.7 mmol d-1 for the 12 day period (negative numbers denote sinks, i.e. flux from the atmosphere to the biosphere). The water use efficiency (WUE) was 1.6 mmol CO2 mol H2O-1 and the light use efficiency (LUE) was 0.95 mmol CO2 mol PPFD-1. Photosynthesis is a weak, but linear function of PPFD. The wet season (represented by Julian day 266&#8211;273, September 2005) was, compared to the dry season, characterized by slightly higher soil moisture availability, higher evapotranspiration and a slightly lower vapor pressure deficit. The mean daily NEE was -152 mmol d-1 for the 8 day period. The WUE was lower, 0.97 mmol CO2 mol H2O-1 and the LUE was higher, 7.2 &#956;mol CO2 mmol PPFD-1 during the wet season compared to the dry season. During the wet season photosynthesis increases with PPFD to about 1600 &#956;mol m-2s-1 and then levels off.
Conclusion:
Based on data collected during two short periods, the studied ecosystem was a sink of carbon both during the dry and wet season 2005. The small sink during the dry season is surprising and similar dry season sinks have not to our knowledge been reported from other similar savanna ecosystems and could have potential management implications for agroforestry. A strong response of NEE versus small changes in plant available soil water content was found. Collection and analysis of flux data for several consecutive years including variations in precipitation, available soil moisture and labile soil carbon are needed for understanding the year to year variation of the carbon budget of this grass land/sparse savanna site in semi arid Sudan.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Jonas Ardo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meelis Molder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bashir El-Tahir</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hatim Elkhidir</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2008, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-3-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-3-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/5/1/7">
        <title>Biodiversity Conservation in the REDD
</title>
        <description>Deforestation and forest degradation in the tropics is a major source of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The tropics also harbour more than half the world&apos;s threatened species, raising the possibility that reducing GHG emissions by curtailing tropical deforestation could provide substantial co-benefits for biodiversity conservation. Here we explore the potential for such co-benefits in Indonesia, a leading source of GHG emissions from land cover and land use change, and among the most species-rich countries in the world. We show that focal ecosystems for interventions to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia do not coincide with areas supporting the most species-rich communities or highest concentration of threatened species. We argue that inherent trade-offs among ecosystems in emission reduction potential, opportunity cost of foregone development and biodiversity values will require a regulatory framework to balance emission reduction interventions with biodiversity co-benefit targets. We discuss how such a regulatory framework might function, and caution that pursuing emission reduction strategies without such a framework may undermine, not enhance, long-term prospects for biodiversity conservation in the tropics.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/5/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Gary Paoli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philip Wells</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Erik Meijaard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mathew Struebig</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Marshall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Krystof Obidzinski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aseng Tan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andjar Rafiastanto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Betsy Yaap</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>J.W. Ferry Slik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandra Morel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Balu Perumal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Niels Wielaard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Simon Husson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura D'Arcy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2010, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-11-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-5-7</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Matching biodiversity conservation with greenhouse gas reduction targets</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>In Indonesia, ecosystems targeted by interventions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions caused by deforestation do not coincide with areas containing the highest concentrations of threatened species or the richest communities. A framework needs to be developed to balance biodiversity conservation with emission reduction strategies.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-5-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-11-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/2">
        <title>Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks with satellite observations:  a comparison of methods

</title>
        <description>Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks in forested regions of the world, particularly the tropics, has attracted a great deal of attention in recent years as deforestation and forest degradation account for up to 30% of anthropogenic carbon emissions, and are now included in climate change negotiations. We review the potential for satellites to measure carbon stocks, specifically aboveground biomass (AGB), and provide an overview of a range of approaches that have been developed and used to map AGB across a diverse set of conditions and geographic areas. We provide a summary of types of remote sensing measurements relevant to mapping AGB, and assess the relative merits and limitations of each. We then provide an overview of traditional techniques of mapping AGB based on ascribing field measurements to vegetation or land cover type classes, and describe the merits and limitations of those relative to recent data mining algorithms used in the context of an approach based on direct utilization of remote sensing measurements, whether optical or lidar reflectance, or radar backscatter. We conclude that while satellite remote sensing has often been discounted as inadequate for the task, attempts to map AGB without satellite imagery are insufficient. Moreover, the direct remote sensing approach provided more coherent maps of AGB relative to traditional approaches. We demonstrate this with a case study focused on continental Africa and discuss the work in the context of reducing uncertainty for carbon monitoring and markets.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Scott Goetz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alessandro Baccini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nadine Laporte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracy Johns</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wayne Walker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josef Kellndorfer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Houghton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mindy Sun</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-4-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/5/1/3">
        <title>Greenhouse gas emission associated with sugar production in southern Brazil</title>
        <description>Background:
Since sugarcane areas have increased rapidly in Brazil, the contribution of the sugarcane production, and, especially, of the sugarcane harvest system to the greenhouse gas emissions of the country is an issue of national concern. Here we analyze some data characterizing various activities of two sugarcane mills during the harvest period of 2006-2007 and quantify the carbon footprint of sugar production.
Results:
According to our calculations, 241 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent were released to the atmosphere per a ton of sugar produced (2406 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent per a hectare of the cropped area, and 26.5 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent per a ton of sugarcane processed). The major part of the total emission (44%) resulted from residues burning; about 20% resulted from the use of synthetic fertilizers, and about 18% from fossil fuel combustion.
Conclusions:
The results of this study suggest that the most important reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane areas could be achieved by switching to a green harvest system, that is, to harvesting without burning.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/5/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Eduardo de Figueiredo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Panosso</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rangel Romao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Newton La Scala</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2010, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-5-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-5-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/1">
        <title>Carbon sequestration via wood burial</title>
        <description>To mitigate global climate change, a portfolio of strategies will be needed to keep the atmospheric CO2 concentration below a dangerous level. Here a carbon sequestration strategy is proposed in which certain dead or live trees are harvested via collection or selective cutting, then buried in trenches or stowed away in above-ground shelters. The largely anaerobic condition under a sufficiently thick layer of soil will prevent the decomposition of the buried wood. Because a large flux of CO2 is constantly being assimilated into the world&apos;s forests via photosynthesis, cutting off its return pathway to the atmosphere forms an effective carbon sink.It is estimated that a sustainable long-term carbon sequestration potential for wood burial is 10 &#177; 5 GtC y-1, and currently about 65 GtC is on the world&apos;s forest floors in the form of coarse woody debris suitable for burial. The potential is largest in tropical forests (4.2 GtC y-1), followed by temperate (3.7 GtC y-1) and boreal forests (2.1 GtC y-1). Burying wood has other benefits including minimizing CO2 source from deforestation, extending the lifetime of reforestation carbon sink, and reducing fire danger. There are possible environmental impacts such as nutrient lock-up which nevertheless appears manageable, but other concerns and factors will likely set a limit so that only part of the full potential can be realized.Based on data from North American logging industry, the cost for wood burial is estimated to be $14/tCO2($50/tC), lower than the typical cost for power plant CO2 capture with geological storage. The cost for carbon sequestration with wood burial is low because CO2 is removed from the atmosphere by the natural process of photosynthesis at little cost. The technique is low tech, distributed, easy to monitor, safe, and reversible, thus an attractive option for large-scale implementation in a world-wide carbon market.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Ning Zeng</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2008, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-3-1</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Climate change? Bury the problem</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Harvesting and burying trees in underground trenches could be an effective carbon sequestration strategy, helping to mitigate global climate change, and is also inexpensive, safe and reversible.
</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-3-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10">
        <title>Estimates of CO2 from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management</title>
        <description>Background:
Fires emit significant amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere. These emissions, however, are highly variable in both space and time. Additionally, CO2 emissions estimates from fires are very uncertain. The combination of high spatial and temporal variability and substantial uncertainty associated with fire CO2 emissions can be problematic to efforts to develop remote sensing, monitoring, and inverse modeling techniques to quantify carbon fluxes at the continental scale. Policy and carbon management decisions based on atmospheric sampling/modeling techniques must account for the impact of fire CO2 emissions; a task that may prove very difficult for the foreseeable future. This paper addresses the variability of CO2 emissions from fires across the US, how these emissions compare to anthropogenic emissions of CO2 and Net Primary Productivity, and the potential implications for monitoring programs and policy development.
Results:
Average annual CO2 emissions from fires in the lower 48 (LOWER48) states from 2002&#8211;2006 are estimated to be 213 (&#177; 50 std. dev.) Tg CO2 yr-1 and 80 (&#177; 89 std. dev.) Tg CO2 yr-1 in Alaska. These estimates have significant interannual and spatial variability. Needleleaf forests in the Southeastern US and the Western US are the dominant source regions for US fire CO2 emissions. Very high emission years typically coincide with droughts, and climatic variability is a major driver of the high interannual and spatial variation in fire emissions. The amount of CO2 emitted from fires in the US is equivalent to 4&#8211;6% of anthropogenic emissions at the continental scale and, at the state-level, fire emissions of CO2 can, in some cases, exceed annual emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel usage.
Conclusion:
The CO2 released from fires, overall, is a small fraction of the estimated average annual Net Primary Productivity and, unlike fossil fuel CO2 emissions, the pulsed emissions of CO2 during fires are partially counterbalanced by uptake of CO2 by regrowing vegetation in the decades following fire. Changes in fire severity and frequency can, however, lead to net changes in atmospheric CO2 and the short-term impacts of fire emissions on monitoring, modeling, and carbon management policy are substantial.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Christine Wiedinmyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jason Neff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2007, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-2-10</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>A burning issue</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>While the long-term atmospheric impact of CO2 release from fires may be small and partially balanced by subsequent vegetation regrowth, the potential short-term effects on monitoring programmes and policy development merit further attention.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-2-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/7">
        <title>An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of &apos;Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation&apos;</title>
        <description>Background:
Negotiations on a future climate policy framework addressing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) are ongoing. Regardless of how such a framework will be designed, many technical solutions of estimating forest cover and forest carbon stock change exist to support policy in monitoring and accounting. These technologies typically combine remotely sensed data with ground-based inventories. In this article we assess the costs of monitoring REDD based on available technologies and requirements associated with key elements of REDD policy.
Results:
We find that the design of a REDD policy framework (and specifically its rules) can have a significant impact on monitoring costs. Costs may vary from 0.5 to 550 US$ per square kilometre depending on the required precision of carbon stock and area change detection. Moreover, they follow economies of scale, i.e. single country or project solutions will face relatively higher monitoring costs.
Conclusion:
Although monitoring costs are relatively small compared to other cost items within a REDD system, they should be shared not only among countries but also among sectors, because an integrated monitoring system would have multiple benefits for non-REDD management. Overcoming initialization costs and unequal access to monitoring technologies is crucial for implementation of an integrated monitoring system, and demands for international cooperation.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Hannes Bottcher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katja Eisbrenner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steffen Fritz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georg Kindermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Florian Kraxner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian McCallum</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Obersteiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-4-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/6/1/18">
        <title>Historic Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Mato Grosso, Brazil: 1) Source Data Uncertainties</title>
        <description>Background:
Historic carbon emissions are an important foundation for proposed efforts to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation and enhance forest carbon stocks through conservation and sustainable forest management (REDD+). The level of uncertainty in historic carbon emissions estimates is also critical for REDD+, since high uncertainties could limit climate benefits from credited mitigation actions. Here, we analyzed source data uncertainties based on the range of available deforestation, forest degradation, and forest carbon stock estimates for the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso during 1990-2008.
Results:
Deforestation estimates showed good agreement for multi-year periods of increasing and decreasing deforestation during the study period. However, annual deforestation rates differed by &gt; 20% in more than half of the years between 1997-2008, even for products based on similar input data. Tier 2 estimates of average forest carbon stocks varied between 99-192 Mg C ha-1, with greatest differences in northwest Mato Grosso. Carbon stocks in deforested areas increased over the study period, yet this increasing trend in deforested biomass was smaller than the difference among carbon stock datasets for these areas.
Conclusions:
Estimates of source data uncertainties are essential for REDD+. Patterns of spatial and temporal disagreement among available data products provide a roadmap for future efforts to reduce source data uncertainties for estimates of historic forest carbon emissions. Specifically, regions with large discrepancies in available estimates of both deforestation and forest carbon stocks are priority areas for evaluating and improving existing estimates. Full carbon accounting for REDD+ will also require filling data gaps, including forest degradation and secondary forest, with annual data on all forest transitions.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/6/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Douglas Morton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcio Sales</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlos Souza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bronson Griscom</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2011, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-6-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-6-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/1/1/6">
        <title>Terrestrial vegetation redistribution and carbon balance under climate change</title>
        <description>Background:
Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) compute the terrestrial carbon balance as well as the transient spatial distribution of vegetation. We study two scenarios of moderate and strong climate change (2.9 K and 5.3 K temperature increase over present) to investigate the spatial redistribution of major vegetation types and their carbon balance in the year 2100.
Results:
The world&apos;s land vegetation will be more deciduous than at present, and contain about 125 billion tons of additional carbon. While a recession of the boreal forest is simulated in some areas, along with a general expansion to the north, we do not observe a reported collapse of the central Amazonian rain forest. Rather, a decrease of biomass and a change of vegetation type occurs in its northeastern part. The ability of the terrestrial biosphere to sequester carbon from the atmosphere declines strongly in the second half of the 21st century.
Conclusion:
Climate change will cause widespread shifts in the distribution of major vegetation functional types on all continents by the year 2100.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/1/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Wolfgang Lucht</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sibyll Schaphoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tim Erbrecht</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ursula Heyder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wolfgang Cramer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2006, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-07-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-1-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-1-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-07-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/7/1/2">
        <title>Human and Environmental Controls over Aboveground Carbon Storage in Madagascar</title>
        <description>Background:
Accurate, high-resolution mapping of aboveground carbon density (ACD, Mg C ha-1) could provide insight into human and environmental controls over ecosystem state and functioning, and could support conservation and climate policy development. However, mapping ACD has proven challenging, particularly in spatially complex regions harboring a mosaic of land use activities, or in remote montane areas that are difficult to access and poorly understood ecologically. Using a combination of field measurements, airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and satellite data, we present the first large-scale, high-resolution estimates of aboveground carbon stocks in Madagascar.
Results:
We found that elevation and the fraction of photosynthetic vegetation (PV) cover, analyzed throughout forests of widely varying structure and condition, account for 27-67% of the spatial variation in ACD. This finding facilitated spatial extrapolation of LiDAR-based carbon estimates to a total of 2,372,680 ha using satellite data. Remote, humid sub-montane forests harbored the highest carbon densities, while ACD was suppressed in dry spiny forests and in montane humid ecosystems, as well as in most lowland areas with heightened human activity. Independent of human activity, aboveground carbon stocks were subject to strong physiographic controls expressed through variation in tropical forest canopy structure measured using airborne LiDAR.
Conclusions:
High-resolution mapping of carbon stocks is possible in remote regions, with or without human activity, and thus carbon monitoring can be brought to highly endangered Malagasy forests as a climate-change mitigation and biological conservation strategy.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/7/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Asner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Clark</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Mascaro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Romuald Vaudry</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>K Chadwick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ghislain Vieilledent</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maminiaina Rasamoelina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aravindh Balaji</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ty Kennedy-Bowdoin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lena Maatoug</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Colgan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Knapp</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-7-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1750-0680-7-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

