<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Carbon Balance and Management - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Carbon Balance and Management</description>
        <dc:date>2009-11-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/8" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/10">
        <title>Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): a climate change mitigation strategy on a critical track</title>
        <description>Background:
Following recent discussions, there is hope that a mechanism for reduction of emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) will be agreed by the Parties of the UNFCCC at their 15th meeting in Copenhagen in 2009 as an eligible action to prevent climate changes and global warming in post-2012 commitment periods. Countries introducing a REDD-regime in order to generate benefits need to implement sound monitoring and reporting systems and specify the associated uncertainties. The principle of conservativeness addresses the problem of estimation errors and requests the reporting of reliable minimum estimates (RME). Here the potential to generate benefits from applying a REDD-regime is proposed with reference to sampling and non-sampling errors that influence the reliability of estimated activity data and emission factors.
Results:
A framework for calculating carbon benefits by including assessment errors is developed. Theoretical, sample based considerations as well as a simulation study for five selected countries with low to high deforestation and degradation rates show that even small assessment errors (5% and less) may outweigh successful efforts to reduce deforestation and degradation.
Conclusion:
The generation of benefits from REDD is possible only in situations where assessment errors are carefully controlled.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Kohl</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Baldauf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Plugge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joachim Krug</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/1">
        <title>Carbon sequestration via wood burial</title>
        <description>To mitigate global climate change, a portfolio of strategies will be needed to keep the atmospheric CO2 concentration below a dangerous level. Here a carbon sequestration strategy is proposed in which certain dead or live trees are harvested via collection or selective cutting, then buried in trenches or stowed away in above-ground shelters. The largely anaerobic condition under a sufficiently thick layer of soil will prevent the decomposition of the buried wood. Because a large flux of CO2 is constantly being assimilated into the world&apos;s forests via photosynthesis, cutting off its return pathway to the atmosphere forms an effective carbon sink.It is estimated that a sustainable long-term carbon sequestration potential for wood burial is 10 &#177; 5 GtC y-1, and currently about 65 GtC is on the world&apos;s forest floors in the form of coarse woody debris suitable for burial. The potential is largest in tropical forests (4.2 GtC y-1), followed by temperate (3.7 GtC y-1) and boreal forests (2.1 GtC y-1). Burying wood has other benefits including minimizing CO2 source from deforestation, extending the lifetime of reforestation carbon sink, and reducing fire danger. There are possible environmental impacts such as nutrient lock-up which nevertheless appears manageable, but other concerns and factors will likely set a limit so that only part of the full potential can be realized.Based on data from North American logging industry, the cost for wood burial is estimated to be $14/tCO2($50/tC), lower than the typical cost for power plant CO2 capture with geological storage. The cost for carbon sequestration with wood burial is low because CO2 is removed from the atmosphere by the natural process of photosynthesis at little cost. The technique is low tech, distributed, easy to monitor, safe, and reversible, thus an attractive option for large-scale implementation in a world-wide carbon market.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Ning Zeng</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2008, 3:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-3-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/11">
        <title>On fair, effective and efficient REDD mechanism design</title>
        <description>The issues surrounding &apos;Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation&apos; (REDD) have become a major component of continuing negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This paper aims to address two key requirements of any potential REDD mechanism: first, the generation of measurable, reportable and verifiable (MRV) REDD credits; and secondly, the sustainable and efficient provision of emission reductions under a robust financing regime.To ensure the supply of MRV credits, we advocate the establishment of an &apos;International Emission Reference Scenario Coordination Centre&apos; (IERSCC). The IERSCC would act as a global clearing house for harmonized data to be used in implementing reference level methodologies. It would be tasked with the collection, reporting and subsequent processing of earth observation, deforestation- and degradation driver information in a globally consistent manner. The IERSCC would also assist, coordinate and supervise the computation of national reference scenarios according to rules negotiated under the UNFCCC. To overcome the threats of &quot;market flooding&quot; on the one hand and insufficient economic incentives for REDD on the other hand, we suggest an &apos;International Investment Reserve&apos; (IIR) as REDD financing framework. In order to distribute the resources of the IIR we propose adopting an auctioning mechanism.Auctioning not only reveals the true emission reduction costs, but might also allow for incentivizing the protection of biodiversity and socio-economic values. The introduced concepts will be vital to ensure robustness, environmental integrity and economic efficiency of the future REDD mechanism.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Obersteiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Huettner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Florian Kraxner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian McCallum</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kentaro Aoki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hannes Bottcher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steffen Fritz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mykola Gusti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Petr Havlik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georg Kindermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ewald Rametsteiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Belinda Reyers</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/2">
        <title>Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks with satellite observations:  a comparison of methods

</title>
        <description>Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks in forested regions of the world, particularly the tropics, has attracted a great deal of attention in recent years as deforestation and forest degradation account for up to 30% of anthropogenic carbon emissions, and are now included in climate change negotiations. We review the potential for satellites to measure carbon stocks, specifically aboveground biomass (AGB), and provide an overview of a range of approaches that have been developed and used to map AGB across a diverse set of conditions and geographic areas. We provide a summary of types of remote sensing measurements relevant to mapping AGB, and assess the relative merits and limitations of each. We then provide an overview of traditional techniques of mapping AGB based on ascribing field measurements to vegetation or land cover type classes, and describe the merits and limitations of those relative to recent data mining algorithms used in the context of an approach based on direct utilization of remote sensing measurements, whether optical or lidar reflectance, or radar backscatter. We conclude that while satellite remote sensing has often been discounted as inadequate for the task, attempts to map AGB without satellite imagery are insufficient. Moreover, the direct remote sensing approach provided more coherent maps of AGB relative to traditional approaches. We demonstrate this with a case study focused on continental Africa and discuss the work in the context of reducing uncertainty for carbon monitoring and markets.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Scott Goetz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alessandro Baccini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nadine Laporte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracy Johns</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wayne Walker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Josef Kellndorfer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Houghton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mindy Sun</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/7">
        <title>An assessment of monitoring requirements and costs of &apos;Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation&apos;</title>
        <description>Background:
Negotiations on a future climate policy framework addressing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) are ongoing. Regardless of how such a framework will be designed, many technical solutions of estimating forest cover and forest carbon stock change exist to support policy in monitoring and accounting. These technologies typically combine remotely sensed data with ground-based inventories. In this article we assess the costs of monitoring REDD based on available technologies and requirements associated with key elements of REDD policy.
Results:
We find that the design of a REDD policy framework (and specifically its rules) can have a significant impact on monitoring costs. Costs may vary from 0.5 to 550 US$ per square kilometre depending on the required precision of carbon stock and area change detection. Moreover, they follow economies of scale, i.e. single country or project solutions will face relatively higher monitoring costs.
Conclusion:
Although monitoring costs are relatively small compared to other cost items within a REDD system, they should be shared not only among countries but also among sectors, because an integrated monitoring system would have multiple benefits for non-REDD management. Overcoming initialization costs and unequal access to monitoring technologies is crucial for implementation of an integrated monitoring system, and demands for international cooperation.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Hannes Bottcher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katja Eisbrenner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steffen Fritz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georg Kindermann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Florian Kraxner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian McCallum</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Obersteiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/7">
        <title>Seasonal variation of carbon fluxes in a sparse savanna
in semi arid Sudan</title>
        <description>Background:
Large spatial, seasonal and annual variability of major drivers of the carbon cycle (precipitation, temperature, fire regime and nutrient availability) are common in the Sahel region. This causes large variability in net ecosystem exchange and in vegetation productivity, the subsistence basis for a major part of the rural population in Sahel. This study compares the 2005 dry and wet season fluxes of CO2 for a grass land/sparse savanna site in semi arid Sudan and relates these fluxes to water availability and incoming photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). Data from this site could complement the current sparse observation network in Africa, a continent where climatic change could significantly impact the future and which constitute a weak link in our understanding of the global carbon cycle.
Results:
The dry season (represented by Julian day 35&#8211;46, February 2005) was characterized by low soil moisture availability, low evapotranspiration and a high vapor pressure deficit. The mean daily NEE (net ecosystem exchange, Eq. 1) was -14.7 mmol d-1 for the 12 day period (negative numbers denote sinks, i.e. flux from the atmosphere to the biosphere). The water use efficiency (WUE) was 1.6 mmol CO2 mol H2O-1 and the light use efficiency (LUE) was 0.95 mmol CO2 mol PPFD-1. Photosynthesis is a weak, but linear function of PPFD. The wet season (represented by Julian day 266&#8211;273, September 2005) was, compared to the dry season, characterized by slightly higher soil moisture availability, higher evapotranspiration and a slightly lower vapor pressure deficit. The mean daily NEE was -152 mmol d-1 for the 8 day period. The WUE was lower, 0.97 mmol CO2 mol H2O-1 and the LUE was higher, 7.2 &#956;mol CO2 mmol PPFD-1 during the wet season compared to the dry season. During the wet season photosynthesis increases with PPFD to about 1600 &#956;mol m-2s-1 and then levels off.
Conclusion:
Based on data collected during two short periods, the studied ecosystem was a sink of carbon both during the dry and wet season 2005. The small sink during the dry season is surprising and similar dry season sinks have not to our knowledge been reported from other similar savanna ecosystems and could have potential management implications for agroforestry. A strong response of NEE versus small changes in plant available soil water content was found. Collection and analysis of flux data for several consecutive years including variations in precipitation, available soil moisture and labile soil carbon are needed for understanding the year to year variation of the carbon budget of this grass land/sparse savanna site in semi arid Sudan.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Jonas Ardo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meelis Molder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bashir El-Tahir</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hatim Elkhidir</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2008, 3:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-3-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/8">
        <title>Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling</title>
        <description>Production efficiency models (PEMs) are based on the theory of light use efficiency (LUE) which states that a relatively constant relationship exists between photosynthetic carbon uptake and radiation receipt at the canopy level. Challenges remain however in the application of the PEM methodology to global net primary productivity (NPP) monitoring. The objectives of this review are as follows: 1) to describe the general functioning of six PEMs (CASA; GLO-PEM; TURC; C-Fix; MOD17; and BEAMS) identified in the literature; 2) to review each model to determine potential improvements to the general PEM methodology; 3) to review the related literature on satellite-based gross primary productivity (GPP) and NPP modeling for additional possibilities for improvement; and 4) based on this review, propose items for coordinated research.This review noted a number of possibilities for improvement to the general PEM architecture - ranging from LUE to meteorological and satellite-based inputs. Current PEMs tend to treat the globe similarly in terms of physiological and meteorological factors, often ignoring unique regional aspects. Each of the existing PEMs has developed unique methods to estimate NPP and the combination of the most successful of these could lead to improvements. It may be beneficial to develop regional PEMs that can be combined under a global framework. The results of this review suggest the creation of a hybrid PEM could bring about a significant enhancement to the PEM methodology and thus terrestrial carbon flux modeling.Key items topping the PEM research agenda identified in this review include the following: LUE should not be assumed constant, but should vary by plant functional type (PFT) or photosynthetic pathway; evidence is mounting that PEMs should consider incorporating diffuse radiation; continue to pursue relationships between satellite-derived variables and LUE, GPP and autotrophic respiration (Ra); there is an urgent need for satellite-based biomass measurements to improve Ra estimation; and satellite-based soil moisture data could improve determination of soil water stress.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Ian McCallum</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wolfgang Wagner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christiane Schmullius</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anatoly Shvidenko</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Obersteiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steffen Fritz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sten Nilsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/6">
        <title>Altitudinal variation in soil organic carbon stock in coniferous subtropical and broadleaf temperate forests in Garhwal Himalaya </title>
        <description>Background:
The Himalayan zones, with dense forest vegetation, cover a fifth part of India and store a third part of the country reserves of soil organic carbon (SOC). However, the details of altitudinal distribution of these carbon stocks, which are vulnerable to forest management and climate change impacts, are not well known.
Results:
This article reports the results of measuring the stocks of SOC along altitudinal gradients. The study was carried out in the coniferous subtropical and broadleaf temperate forests of Garhwal Himalaya. The stocks of SOC were found to be decreasing with altitude: from 185.6 to 160.8 t C ha-1 and from 141.6 to 124.8 t C ha-1 in temperature (Quercus leucotrichophora) and subtropical (Pinus roxburghii) forests, respectively.
Conclusion:
The results of this study lead to conclusion that the ability of soil to stabilize soil organic matter depends negatively on altitude and call for comprehensive theoretical explanation</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Mehraj Sheikh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Munesh Kumar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rainer Bussmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2009, 4:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-4-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10">
        <title>Estimates of CO2 from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management</title>
        <description>Background:
Fires emit significant amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere. These emissions, however, are highly variable in both space and time. Additionally, CO2 emissions estimates from fires are very uncertain. The combination of high spatial and temporal variability and substantial uncertainty associated with fire CO2 emissions can be problematic to efforts to develop remote sensing, monitoring, and inverse modeling techniques to quantify carbon fluxes at the continental scale. Policy and carbon management decisions based on atmospheric sampling/modeling techniques must account for the impact of fire CO2 emissions; a task that may prove very difficult for the foreseeable future. This paper addresses the variability of CO2 emissions from fires across the US, how these emissions compare to anthropogenic emissions of CO2 and Net Primary Productivity, and the potential implications for monitoring programs and policy development.
Results:
Average annual CO2 emissions from fires in the lower 48 (LOWER48) states from 2002&#8211;2006 are estimated to be 213 (&#177; 50 std. dev.) Tg CO2 yr-1 and 80 (&#177; 89 std. dev.) Tg CO2 yr-1 in Alaska. These estimates have significant interannual and spatial variability. Needleleaf forests in the Southeastern US and the Western US are the dominant source regions for US fire CO2 emissions. Very high emission years typically coincide with droughts, and climatic variability is a major driver of the high interannual and spatial variation in fire emissions. The amount of CO2 emitted from fires in the US is equivalent to 4&#8211;6% of anthropogenic emissions at the continental scale and, at the state-level, fire emissions of CO2 can, in some cases, exceed annual emissions of CO2 from fossil fuel usage.
Conclusion:
The CO2 released from fires, overall, is a small fraction of the estimated average annual Net Primary Productivity and, unlike fossil fuel CO2 emissions, the pulsed emissions of CO2 during fires are partially counterbalanced by uptake of CO2 by regrowing vegetation in the decades following fire. Changes in fire severity and frequency can, however, lead to net changes in atmospheric CO2 and the short-term impacts of fire emissions on monitoring, modeling, and carbon management policy are substantial.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Christine Wiedinmyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jason Neff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2007, 2:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-2-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/8">
        <title>Potential of wind power projects under the clean development mechanism in India</title>
        <description>Background:
So far, the cumulative installed capacity of wind power projects in India is far below their gross potential (&#8804; 15%) despite very high level of policy support, tax benefits, long term financing schemes etc., for more than 10 years etc. One of the major barriers is the high costs of investments in these systems. The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol provides industrialized countries with an incentive to invest in emission reduction projects in developing countries to achieve a reduction in CO2 emissions at lowest cost that also promotes sustainable development in the host country. Wind power projects could be of interest under the CDM because they directly displace greenhouse gas emissions while contributing to sustainable rural development, if developed correctly.
Results:
Our estimates indicate that there is a vast theoretical potential of CO2 mitigation by the use of wind energy in India. The annual potential Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs) of wind power projects in India could theoretically reach 86 million. Under more realistic assumptions about diffusion of wind power projects based on past experiences with the government-run programmes, annual CER volumes by 2012 could reach 41 to 67 million and 78 to 83 million by 2020.
Conclusion:
The projections based on the past diffusion trend indicate that in India, even with highly favorable assumptions, the dissemination of wind power projects is not likely to reach its maximum estimated potential in another 15 years. CDM could help to achieve the maximum utilization potential more rapidly as compared to the current diffusion trend if supportive policies are introduced.</description>
        <link>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Pallav Purohit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Axel Michaelowa</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Carbon Balance and Management 2007, 2:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-07-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1750-0680-2-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Carbon Balance and Management</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1750-0680</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-07-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
