Table 4 |
|||||||
|
Substitution effectiveness by fuel and conversion process combination, weighting factors reflecting the current substitutable fossil fuel mix of Thuringia and regional substitution effectiveness for Thuringia (t fossil fuel-C substituted per t of biofuel-C harvested) |
|||||||
|
Fuel |
Heat plant; natural gas |
Combined heat and power plant; natural gas |
Combined heat and power plant; light heating oil |
Heat plant. light heating oil |
Power plant; hard coal |
Power plant; lignite |
Regional substitution effectiveness in Thuringia |
|
|
|||||||
|
Triticum, whole crop |
0.36 |
0.38 |
0.53 |
0.54 |
0.70 |
0.75 |
0.49 |
|
Populus, short- rotation coppice |
0.42 |
0.44 |
0.62 |
0.63 |
0.80 |
0.86 |
0.57 |
|
Picea , wood for energy |
0.42 |
0.44 |
0.62 |
0.63 |
0.81 |
0.87 |
0.57 |
|
Picea, slash |
0.44 |
0.45 |
0.64 |
0.65 |
0.83 |
0.89 |
0.59 |
|
Triticum, straw |
0.45 |
0.47 |
0.66 |
0.67 |
0.86 |
0.92 |
0.61 |
|
Weighting factors |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.07 |
0.17 |
- |
|
|
|||||||
|
Böttcher et al. Carbon Balance and Management 2012 7:5 doi:10.1186/1750-0680-7-5 |
|||||||