|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 6.
Regional differences (with 95% confidence intervals) in C stocks (Tg) by estimation
method (CRM vs. CRM+DRF and CRM vs. CRM+DRF+SLA) and decay class for quaking aspen
(left) in the Lake States (2005-2009) and Douglas-fir (right) in the Pacific Northwest
(2001-2009).
Domke et al. Carbon Balance and Management 2011 6:14 doi:10.1186/1750-0680-6-14 |
