Table 1 |
||||||
|
Carbon by reservoir for each of five ranches assessed by the two land cover types |
||||||
|
Ranch |
Vineyards |
Wildlands |
||||
|
Soil Mg C/ha |
AG-Wood Mg C/ha |
Total Mg C/ha |
Soil Mg C/ha |
AG-Wood Mg C/ha |
Total Mg C/ha |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Chalfont/Ledford |
118.7 |
3.6 |
122.3 |
132.7 |
14.0 |
146.6 |
|
Butler |
76.0 |
2.3 |
78.3 |
87.6 |
47.6 |
135.2 |
|
McNab |
92.3 |
4.5 |
96.8 |
106.8 |
19.2 |
125.9 |
|
Sundial |
80.0 |
4.1 |
84.1 |
91.8 |
22.8 |
114.7 |
|
Hooper |
68.0 |
0.7 |
68.7 |
83.8 |
34.3 |
118.1 |
|
|
||||||
|
Average |
84.1 |
3.0 |
87.1 |
89.3 |
36.8 |
126.1 |
|
|
||||||
|
Std Dev |
6.6 |
0.48 |
7.0 |
14.5 |
8.6 |
22.9 |
|
|
||||||
|
Estimates were derived by fitting multivariate linear regressions to C values for sample plots (aboveground) and measured soil C (from soil pits) using environmental variables such as elevation, slope, solar radiation, soil taxonomy, normalized differential vegetation index (NDVI) and habitat type in a GIS platform (see methods). Soil C is to 1 m depth; AG = aboveground; aboveground C on wildlands excludes grasslands. |
||||||
|
Williams et al. Carbon Balance and Management 2011 6:11 doi:10.1186/1750-0680-6-11 |
||||||